Indiana Lawmakers Mull Inclusion of AI-Generated Imagery in Revenge Porn Legislation

by | Jan 13, 2024

Lawmakers in Indiana are currently dealing with the challenge of keeping up with emerging issues in the evolving digital age. One such issue is the troubling trend of revenge pornography created using artificial intelligence (AI). With advancements in AI technology, wrongdoers can now make highly realistic images and videos that are nearly identical to real ones. In response to this concerning development, Indiana legislators are considering expanding the state’s existing revenge porn law to include AI-generated content.

Revenge pornography involves the non-consensual sharing of intimate images or videos, which is already a crime in Indiana. However, the rapid progress of AI technology has given rise to manipulative individuals who can create fake images by putting someone’s face on another person’s body or by making completely nude images. This alarming situation has prompted calls for updated legislation to address this new form of revenge pornography.

HB 1047, a bill currently under consideration, aims to include computer-generated images and videos within Indiana’s existing revenge porn law. The Indiana Prosecuting Attorneys Council supports this proposed addition, recognizing the need to adapt legislation to combat crimes facilitated by evolving technology. However, critics are concerned about the bill’s language, suggesting that it might be too broad and potentially infringe on First Amendment rights.

The Indiana Public Defender Council has expressed concerns, questioning whether the bill’s scope might extend to harmless cartoonish depictions or hand-drawn illustrations that may not fall under the category of revenge pornography. Striking the right balance between protecting victims and safeguarding constitutional rights is a significant challenge for lawmakers.

To ensure compliance with constitutional principles, it may be necessary to refine the bill’s language. While the intention of the legislation is clear and important, it is crucial to carefully craft the law to prevent unintended consequences. A clear distinction must be made between harmful AI-generated content that facilitates non-consensual sharing and innocent forms of artistic expression.

Despite these concerns, the fact that the state Supreme Court has already upheld the existing revenge porn law shows how seriously this issue is taken within the judicial system. Expanding the law to include AI-generated content would further strengthen it, sending a strong message that non-consensual sharing of intimate images or videos, regardless of their origin, will not be tolerated.

The bill is currently being discussed in Indiana and will soon be presented for further consideration on the House floor. The support from the Indiana Prosecuting Attorneys Council reflects an increasing recognition of the urgent need to address the emerging threat of AI-generated revenge pornography.

One challenge associated with this issue is the difficulty individuals face in proving that an AI-generated image does not depict them. This raises concerns about false accusations and the potential for innocent people to be wrongly involved in revenge porn cases. Striking a balance between protecting victims and safeguarding the rights of the accused is crucial in developing effective legislation.

Another important aspect to consider is the protection of First Amendment rights, as the dissemination of images of the nude human body is protected by the Constitution. While the intention of the bill is to combat harmful AI-generated content, it is essential to ensure that it does not infringe on individuals’ freedom of expression.

As the debate on HB 1047 continues, Indiana lawmakers must navigate the complex intersection of technology, privacy, and freedom of expression. The rise of AI-generated revenge pornography requires a thoughtful and comprehensive approach that ensures justice for victims while upholding the principles enshrined in the Constitution. It remains to be seen how the bill’s language will be refined to strike this delicate balance, but one thing is clear – action is necessary to address this troubling trend in the digital age.